Indeed I have found exactly the same; firstly the search facility is nothing like as good as Google and its ilk, secondly there are a lot of standards which have nominally had their prefix references changed but actually the document itself has not actually yet been changed.
Conversely the easiest way to find a Railway Group Standard for which you know the reference, is to type it in WITH the GK/RT or whatever prefix directly into Google- almost never get any other fals finds and it is invariably is quicker than getting via the RSSB navigation pages (and tends to bypass all the warning pages re the use of colour printers etc.to boot)
Actually I have recently obtained a national non-compliance to 10097 pending standard change so presumably it will one day be abolished. It is not that much of it is actually wrong, but it really developed for one specific project that was never actually implemented- it was wrong that this one interpretation of the standards was made a mandatory standard. Similarly it has not been kept up to date with more recent standards and really was subsidiarry to the various GK/RT Railway Group Standards anyway ....
Conversely the easiest way to find a Railway Group Standard for which you know the reference, is to type it in WITH the GK/RT or whatever prefix directly into Google- almost never get any other fals finds and it is invariably is quicker than getting via the RSSB navigation pages (and tends to bypass all the warning pages re the use of colour printers etc.to boot)
Actually I have recently obtained a national non-compliance to 10097 pending standard change so presumably it will one day be abolished. It is not that much of it is actually wrong, but it really developed for one specific project that was never actually implemented- it was wrong that this one interpretation of the standards was made a mandatory standard. Similarly it has not been kept up to date with more recent standards and really was subsidiarry to the various GK/RT Railway Group Standards anyway ....
Peter Wrote:Reference number is correct. Document is titled: "Interlocking Rules requirements applicable to Network Rail Infrastructure".
If you have access to the search facility on the IHS system, just try putting in the 10097, don't bother with the letters - in my experience that does stop it finding things.

