19-04-2014, 06:57 AM
Dear Dorothy
Yes I saw the inconsistent shunt routes with overlap and no overlap. I didn't understand well enough. I have studied your attempt other years also which are helpful and I saw PVW's comments to stick with permissive shunt(no overlap)
416B M/C
371B will be added in the main route.
Shunt routes need to be permissive.
365(M/W/C)
Swinging overlaps will be changed to reflect "points" and "tracks" column.
235R is unneccessary. Agree
AC, AD, AE, BX, BV I thought about track flank when a train overruns. Should I delete them?
Warner route will be put a note to step up to main.
371D(S)
382A(S) not the opposing route because of 238N. Am I right?
I don't understand a note "Preset by..." Can u explain more?
Appreciate your comments. Wishing you and your kid all the best
Arnut
Yes I saw the inconsistent shunt routes with overlap and no overlap. I didn't understand well enough. I have studied your attempt other years also which are helpful and I saw PVW's comments to stick with permissive shunt(no overlap)
416B M/C
371B will be added in the main route.
Shunt routes need to be permissive.
365(M/W/C)
Swinging overlaps will be changed to reflect "points" and "tracks" column.
235R is unneccessary. Agree
AC, AD, AE, BX, BV I thought about track flank when a train overruns. Should I delete them?
Warner route will be put a note to step up to main.
371D(S)
382A(S) not the opposing route because of 238N. Am I right?
I don't understand a note "Preset by..." Can u explain more?
Appreciate your comments. Wishing you and your kid all the best
Arnut